Buck covers AP Biology only. For FRQs, paste one part of a question and your answer to it, and ask "which point did I miss?" That beats "how do I do FRQs."
Buck lives in the chat bubble at the bottom right of this page.
Half the exam is six handwritten questions, and every one of them is built from the same short list of parts. Learn the shapes and the verbs and the free response stops being a writing test. It becomes a checklist.
Six questions in 90 minutes, worth half your score. Two long questions at 9 points each, four short questions at 4 points each. You write by hand in a booklet. A formula sheet is provided. Every point is one task. A 4 point question is four things to say, not four paragraphs. Nobody earns a fifth point for writing more.
The six question numbers are six fixed types, and the parts inside each one follow a ladder that barely changes from year to year. Part (a) is nearly always a content question you could answer without reading the experiment. The last part is nearly always "justify" or "support," and that is where the average score falls apart. On recent exams, short questions averaged under 2.5 out of 4 and long questions averaged under 5 out of 9. The describe points get earned. The justify points do not.
This page gives you the six ladders, a translation table for the task verbs, the eight archetypes that make up almost every part, the graphing checklist, and two practice FRQs on Unit 1 content that you score yourself one point at a time.
This is the structure the College Board publishes. Memorize the shape of each one and you will know what part (d) is going to ask before you read part (a).
| Question | Type | The ladder, part by part |
|---|---|---|
| 1 9 pts | Interpret and evaluate experimental results | (a) Describe a concept behind the experiment. (b) Identify design elements: the control, the independent and dependent variables, and justify why they were chosen. (c) Analyze the data: describe a trend, compare groups. (d) Predict the effect of a change and justify it. |
| 2 9 pts | Same, with graphing | (a) Describe a concept. (b) Construct a graph from a table, usually with error bars. This is 4 of the 9 points. (c) Analyze the data, often using the error bars to say what is significant. (d) Predict and justify. |
| 3 4 pts | Scientific investigation | (a) Describe a concept. (b) Identify a control or a procedure, or state the null hypothesis. (c) Predict the result. (d) Justify the prediction. |
| 4 4 pts | Conceptual analysis | (a) Describe. (b) Explain a mechanism. (c) Predict the effect of a disruption. (d) Justify. |
| 5 4 pts | Analyze a model or visual | (a) Describe one part of the model. (b) Explain a relationship between two parts. (c) Trace, mark, or identify something on the model. (d) Explain what the model shows about a bigger idea. |
| 6 4 pts | Analyze data | (a) Describe the data (a value, a trend). (b) Describe a second feature of the data (often the variation, not the mean). (c) Use the data to support or refute a hypothesis. (d) Explain how the result connects to a biological principle. |
Same move as the multiple choice: find the verb first. On the FRQ the verb is not a hint. It is the literal scoring criterion. Readers are trained on these definitions, and the Chief Reader reports list "confusion between identify and describe" and "restating the stimulus instead of using biology" as point losses every single year.
| The verb says | The point requires | What loses it |
|---|---|---|
| Identify | Name it. One phrase. "The control is the tube with substrate and no enzyme." | Writing three sentences. Naming a held constant condition when asked for the control group. |
| Describe | Give characteristics of the thing. What it is, what it does. No "why" required. | Vagueness ("ribosomes make amino acids"). Describing the wrong step of a process. |
| Explain | Give the mechanism that connects A to B. Cause, then effect, with the biology in between. | Restating that A and B are related without the step in between. Restating the stimulus. |
| Predict | State a specific outcome with a direction. "The rate will decrease." "The cell will gain mass." | "It will be affected." "More" or "fewer" when a specific value is possible (zero copies, not "fewer"). |
| Justify | Give the reasoning that supports a claim or prediction you already made. Evidence, then mechanism. | A second prediction instead of a reason. Reasoning with no reference to the data or the scenario. |
| Support a claim | Point to specific data ("group 2 produced 18.6 mg/g vs 4.1") and say why the data mean what you say they mean. | Evidence with no reasoning. Reasoning with no numbers. Using the wrong figure when the question names one. |
| Calculate | Show the setup, the arithmetic, the unit, and the sign. Box it. | No units. Wrong sign on ψS. Celsius instead of kelvin. Dividing nucleotides by 2 to get amino acids. |
| Construct a graph | Four separate points: labeled axes with units, a scale that fits the data, correct plotting, error bars or a key. See the checklist below. | Missing units. A y axis that cuts off the top bar. Asymmetric error bars. |
| State the null hypothesis | "There is no difference" or "X has no effect on Y." | Writing the experimental hypothesis ("X will increase Y"). |
| Determine / Evaluate | Reach a conclusion and say what in the data got you there. | A conclusion with no data behind it. |
Underline the verb in every part before you write. Then write one sentence per point that does exactly what the verb says. If the part is worth 1 point and asks you to "identify," your answer is a phrase. If it asks you to "justify," your answer is two sentences: the evidence, then the why. Match the length to the verb, not to how much you know.
Same idea as the causal chains on the strategy pages. On a multiple choice question you run the chain from the clue to the concept to the answer. On an FRQ you run it from the verb to the tool to the sentence. If you cannot say each link out loud, you are not ready to write.
| Link | What you actually think |
|---|---|
| 1. Verbs | (a) Describe, 1. (b) Explain, 1. (c) Predict, 1. (d) Justify, 1. Four sentences total, two of them with a mechanism. |
| 2. Tools | (a) giveaway describe. (b) explain a mechanism. (c) predict the disruption, needs a direction. (d) justify, evidence then mechanism. |
| 3. Hunt | Amber: aquaporin is a channel, the membrane spanning region is mostly nonpolar, a mutation puts a glutamic acid there. Blue: R groups, tertiary structure, hydrophobic interior of the bilayer. |
| 4. Concepts | Nonpolar region in a nonpolar environment is hydrophobic interactions (U1 C5). Swapping one R group is primary structure, and its effect on the fold is tertiary (U1 C11, C12). Shape determines function (U1 C13). |
| 5. Chain | Charged R group in the nonpolar region → repelled by fatty acid tails → region misfolds or pulls out of the membrane → channel shape changes → water cannot pass → transport falls. |
| 6. Sentences | (a) Interactions between R groups: hydrogen bonds, ionic bonds, hydrophobic interactions, disulfide bridges. (b) Nonpolar R groups are stable among the nonpolar tails; polar or charged ones are not. (c) Transport decreases. (d) Charged R group, unstable in the core, misfold, shape, function. |
| 7. Check | Direction in (c)? Yes, "decreases." Mechanism in (b) and (d)? Yes. Done. Four points, about six sentences. |
Across the released exams, the parts repeat. Here are the eight shapes with a Unit 1 example of each, a model answer that earns the point, and the specific way students lose it.
Run the chain first: verbs, tools, hunt, concepts, chain, then sentences. Write your answer to each part in the box. Then reveal the rubric for that part and check the box only if your answer actually does what the rubric says. Be a hard grader. The exam will be.
Aquaporin is a channel protein embedded in the plasma membrane that allows water to cross rapidly. The portion of the protein that spans the hydrophobic interior of the membrane is composed mostly of amino acids with nonpolar R groups. A mutation replaces one of these nonpolar amino acids with glutamic acid, which has a negatively charged R group at cellular pH.
This one has a graph in it. Draw it on paper, then grade it against the four checks. The rest of the parts work like Practice A.
Soybean seedlings were grown for four weeks in sterile sand containing no nitrogen compounds. All plants received normal air (about 78 percent N₂), water, and light. Four groups of eight plants each received a different treatment. At the end of four weeks, leaf protein was measured. Mean leaf protein and standard error (SE) are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Leaf protein after four weeks| Group | Treatment | Mean leaf protein (mg/g) | SE (mg/g) | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nothing added | 4.1 | 0.2 | 8 |
| 2 | Nitrogen fixing bacteria added | 18.6 | 0.5 | 8 |
| 3 | Ammonium (NH₄⁺) fertilizer added | 19.2 | 0.4 | 8 |
| 4 | Phosphate (PO₄³⁻) fertilizer added | 4.4 | 0.25 | 8 |
Draw it on paper. Then check each of the four graph points against your drawing.
One point, one sentence, one verb. Underline the verb, write the sentence that does what it says, include the direction and the number if there is one, name the mechanism, and stop. Then go to the next part.
Every part (a) on this page came straight from the 15 concepts. If one of them was fuzzy, that is where to go.
Unit 1 strategy Unit 1 practice quiz